n8n vsMake
Pricing, features, and which one fits your team — compared from each tool's own pricing and product pages.
Both are visual workflow builders. Make is fully hosted, cheaper to start ($9/month) and has more integrations (3,000+). n8n can be self-hosted for free and bills cloud runs per execution with unlimited steps, which favours long workflows. Choose Make for a hosted canvas with breadth, n8n for self-hosting, code, and volume.
n8n vs Make at a glance
| n8n | Make | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free self-hosted; Cloud from €20/month | Free; paid from $9/month |
| What you pay for | Workflow executions — unlimited steps each | Credits — each module operation |
| Integrations | 1,500+ | 3,000+ |
| Self-hosting | Yes — free Community Edition | No |
| Custom code | JavaScript and Python nodes | Limited, via custom apps and functions |
| AI agents | AI Agent node, MCP | Make AI Agents (beta) |
| Licence | Sustainable Use License (fair-code) | Proprietary |
Which should you choose?
Choose n8n if…
- You need to self-host, or want to avoid per-operation pricing.
- Your workflows run many steps per execution.
- You want to drop into code when a node does not exist.
Choose Make if…
- You want hosting, updates and uptime handled for you.
- You need an app in Make's larger library.
- Your team prefers a polished visual editor over code.
A third option
Where Ideople fits
If what you are really building is an AI agent — something that reads, decides and acts — Ideople skips the canvas: describe the job, connect the tools, choose a trigger. Every action is graded by risk, high-risk ones wait for approval, and every run leaves a step-by-step trace.
n8n vs Make: questions people ask
Sources
Prices and features as published on October 2026. Vendors change plans often; check their pages before you buy.